The EU´s Betrayal

The EU’s Betrayal
Peter Kopa, Prague, November 12, 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FGBJd178ME

Introduction

We present a review of an Open Letter to the EU that reveals the extent to which former communist countries reject it. The author, Rade Pokorný, is a well-known lawyer in Prague, also for his political analyses. He presents a forceful proclamation in which the “Resistance Movement” of citizens from EU member states has issued a damning verdict against the EU president. Van der Leyen seeks to enslave the European peoples, destroy their economies, and push them into a war against Russia.

The last straw was her arrogant and brazen speech, as President of the European Commission, before the European Parliament, as if the devastating plan to dismantle European states and their nations were already a fait accompli.

It is true that Europe is collapsing economically, socially, and morally, but Ursula von der Leyen, despite this—or rather, precisely because of it—triumphantly boasted, like a Hitler in a skirt, that she had already subjugated it. In fact, it was precisely this tirade of hers that Václav Klaus, former head of government in the Czech Republic, responded to in his October 28 speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwgDFDEymdE

The globalist cabal she represents is in a hurry, because the upcoming elections in France, Spain, and other countries are a nightmare for this unelected “elite” that pulls the strings from behind the scenes. The document from the “Resistance Movement” in all member states responds to this:

Open Letter to the President of the EU

Ursula von der Leyen, in her State of the Union address this year, told Europeans that only the Brussels dictatorship can provide them with genuine sovereignty. This is the response:

Madam President,
in your State of the Union address, you asked us if we wanted a stronger and more independent Europe, with greater capacity for action. You told us that “only Europe can guarantee Europeans genuine sovereignty.” You called for the creation of new European security structures and greater economic integration. And you asked Europeans for a response.

Our answer is NO. Not because we reject Europe. Europe is our home. But we reject her claim that only the EU can give Europeans true sovereignty. Sovereignty is not something the European Union can grant us, since all political power emanates from the people. Its source is not the state, nor the government, nor the European Union.

Since the people are sovereign, the state exists to serve them and carry out their will. Its power emanates from the people, and not the other way around. And so, the European Union exists to serve its member states and carry out their will, and it exercises only those powers that they have decided to entrust to it. The European Union is not a sovereign state and cannot grant any sovereignty to Europeans.

You Do Not Have Our Mandate

The countries that joined the EU in 2004—many of them recently liberated from totalitarian regimes—became part of a Union based on the treaties in force at that time. Shortly thereafter, the draft European Constitution was presented. When citizens were asked about this proposal, France said NO. The Netherlands said NO.

Much of this draft was later reintroduced through the Treaty of Lisbon. This treaty expanded the use of qualified majority voting, as well as the EU’s powers at the European level; however, almost no European nation had the opportunity to vote directly on this treaty. Ireland was the exception: the Irish initially rejected the Treaty of Lisbon, and after certain safeguards were negotiated, they were asked to vote again.

The European Union as it exists today has thus developed far beyond what millions of people in Central and Eastern Europe initially voted for. This is an important fact to consider when discussing European sovereignty today.

The EU Follows in the Footsteps of Napoleon and Hitler

https://thinktanklatam.org/5520/

On two occasions, over the course of barely two centuries, a continental European power had subjugated much of Europe under its control, even directing its forces eastward against Russia: Napoleon in 1812 and Hitler in 1941. Both campaigns ended in a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions.

We will not allow Europe to organize itself a third time for the same purpose. We will not again be “useful idiots” in wars devised by others, paid for with our money, and fought by our children. Europe must never again unify for the purpose of waging war. Europe’s bloody history does not grant any European institution the moral mandate to turn the peoples of Europe into a single continental power.

Attempts to concentrate power on this continent over the centuries have time and again ended in rivalry, domination, and war. That is why we reject the idea that another war with Russia or any other power could serve to forcibly unify Europe.

It is a true dictatorship

https://thinktanklatam.org/5185/

Decades of uncontrolled immigration and insufficient enforcement of regulations have placed growing pressure on housing, schools, public services, and national budgets, while undermining citizens’ confidence in governments’ ability to control who enters their countries and who remains there. These priorities are also reflected in its own budget: in 2026, the European Union allocated more than 13 billion euros to its own administration, but only about 5 billion euros to migration and border management.

We also reject the political notion that mass migration can be used to weaken national identity. People from countries outside Europe naturally do not share the same inherited connection to our national history, our institutions, and our states. It may be easier to convince a population with weaker shared historical ties that these nations are an anachronism and should give way to a single supranational European state.

Confrontation Instead of Diplomacy

Relations with Russia are, to a large extent, frozen, while relations with China—and even with the United States—are increasingly contentious. The Union must be able to maintain functional relations with the major powers, even when we disagree with them.
You do not respect your own principles:
The EU promises subsidiarity—decision-making as close to the citizens as possible—while power, regulation, and administration continue to be concentrated at the central level in Brussels.
You do not protect freedom of expression, privacy, or political dissent.

Private communications face increasingly broad regulatory oversight. EU institutions are intervening more and more deeply in the realm of political information on the Internet; some people are even losing their banking services because of their political or philosophical convictions.
And your response to these failures is to give more power to Brussels?
Our answer is NO!