ARTÍCULOS EN ESPAÑOL E INGLÉS PARA ESPAÑA, AMBAS AMÉRICAS Y USA
ARTICLES IN SPANISH AND ENGLISH FOR SPAIN, BOTH AMERICAS AND THE USA

18.5.2021, Peter Kopa, Prague

 

A bit of history

In history there has always been some group of malcontents in political affairs, rightly or wrongly, who have been unable to manifest themselves as long as the sanction of political power pursued them by force.  Thus, for example, in the empires of the Middle East, in the centuries long before Christ, opposition to the ruler, on any issue, was persecuted with disproportionate severity.

In our days, under the protection of political rights, groups do well to express their discontent according to the rules of law, morality and common sense. But the interesting thing is that the opposition group -which can be many millions- can be transformed into a political force, the very moment someone manages to structure that discontent in the form of a movement or a political party, thanks to the fact that each individual has the right to vote when it comes to electing the government. ¿Por qué el globalismo apoya a la izquierda?

This is where, historically, ideologues have intervened, for example, seeking to take advantage of discontent to turn it into a weapon and a political platform.  And this in all variations from the political right to the political left, which has manifested itself, for about three centuries, as a tensed arc that has given more and more movement to the processes of determination and surveillance of the government. In this sense, the most paradigmatic cases are the French Revolution of 1789, the Marxist revolution of 1917 and the German Nazism. All these events have been based on principles, or a set of ideas or ideology, as a justification for violence, which was presented as necessary to achieve their apparently good political goals.

Woke, one more rehash of Marxism

The word WOKE means in English to be alert or awake, in the sense of not allowing any injustice according to the mentality of this ideological mindset. It is a new form of Marxist materialism, with the aggravating factor of being a cynical and derisive attitude towards anything political or social opposed to the taste of the ‘wokers’.  It supports the Black Live Matters (BLM), LGBT, Gay culture, genderism etc. movements.

This ideology emerged in the USA and is slowly spreading in Europe, among a minority that feels marginalized and failed, just like in the USA. It is simply a new dress that embraces part of the left, the BLM (black live matters), the LGBT (lesbian, gay, black and transgender), genderism etc. etc., thus seeking to achieve a greater force of political shock, because in reality they are a minority. However, this minority knows how to make noise and take advantage of the legal resources offered by the State to complain and lament publicly about any issue that, in the opinion of their leaders, offers an opportunity to protest openly, even to the point of violence.

And the sad thing is that on the one hand they have the tacit support of Biden, and, on the other hand, they are manipulated by the Deep State (Bilderberg, Soros, Bill Gates, Davos Forum united in secret societies) as useful fools, throwing them as a weapon to destabilize the social and economic order, necessary for the establishment of the New World Order. This was explained by the founder of the Davos Forum proclaiming: ‘Everything will be taken away from you and you will be very happy’. WOKE’s profile is as follows:

– Promotion of globalization in the style of the New World Order, which calls for ending borders that divide countries, ousting their political authorities and destroying the current social, cultural and economic order.

– Abolition of traditional values such as the homeland, the flag, etc.

– Rewriting history, purifying it of ‘lies’, which leads, among other things, to the destruction of monuments.

– Fight against the Church and Christianity, as structures of exploitation.

– Cancellation of the right to property, so that everything falls under the control and distribution of the State.

– Cultivation of hatred against those who oppose them,

– Contempt for the white race, for being the one that exploits the other races. This racist attitude is analogous to Nazi racism.

– Support of the satanic subculture, which manifests itself in Hollywood cinema and in some Netflix movies, where cartoons seek, for example, to stimulate the sexual instinct in children.

 

Who directs and pays for it?

At this point in our history, it is well known that no political process with negative ideology has arisen as if by ‘spontaneous generation’: it has been seen later that there have always been, behind the scenes, some strings pulling the political agitators and a lot of money ready to pay the costs of the strategies of conquest of political command. The best example, in this sense, is the group of rich Jews in the USA that diplomatically and financially organized the famous sealed train that took Lenin from Zurich, without stopping at borders, to St. Petersburg. (https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-39381989)

In many of the BLM demonstrations in the USA, the FBI said that those who destroyed and burned were professional agitators, that is, a small group, who traveled by plane from one to another point of the country, receiving economic support and orders from an invisible hand. And they stayed overnight in good hotels, to keep themselves in good shape for the next journey.

Then there is the support of the mainstream-media, which control more than 80% of the information media, social networks and cinema worldwide (6′ 1 billion usd from Soros to manipulate world thought with ideologies: Agustín Laje Arrigoni speaks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYJ5KK5fo7c).

The most astonishing of all this is that the secret influence around the world acts through the promotion of laws, so that they can then be imposed even by police force or with severe penalties. Examples of this can be found in the EU, which openly supports homosexuals, abortions, sex education for children from the age of eight, equating homosexual unions with traditional marriage and genderism. About this issue, the member states had no influence, although the member states maintain the EU with the contribution of their citizen.  (Pandemias de las ideas)

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Más de nuestro blog