Control of the world by the IMF and banks
Peter Kopa, Prague, December 6, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ungFqZ_wNQ
The International Monetary Fund
Accepting loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or large banks often involves accepting conditions that can result in a loss of autonomy for borrowing countries and political and economic control over their internal policies. These preconditions include economic reforms, privatization, and market liberalization, which limit countries’ ability to set their own priorities.
These conditions were designed to favor the interests of the US, but this regime is coming to an end due to the impact of the BRIC group of countries that have aligned themselves with China and Russia and now represent 46% of the world’s population and 41% of its economic productivity. It remains to be seen whether this multipolar geopolitical transformation will be better than the unipolar world led by the US: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX0ekzsd6v4
For their part, large banks, like multilateral organizations, often set their own requirements in exchange for loans, reinforcing the pattern of external influence and conditioning the development strategies of recipient countries.
In short, there is broad consensus in the critical literature on how IMF and international bank loans can become tools of political and economic control and manipulation, limiting the sovereignty of borrowing countries and conditioning their strategic decisions. We offer a speech by Jeffrey Sachs on this subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACg8VxQtA58
Revelations by Ms. Karen Huds
The Bank for International Settlements in Basel is little known and receives little media coverage, considering its great importance as the bank of central banks for all countries around the world. The flow of transactions supervised by this institution in 2012 is impressive: currency purchase and sale operations alone moved at an average daily level of USD 5.3 trillion, with a strong upward trend, dominated by the USD, followed by the euro and the yen.
The financial centers that conduct these businesses are mainly located in Great Britain, the USA, Singapore, Switzerland, and Japan. However, only 15 to 20% of these operations were justified by actual commercial transactions. This means that more than 80% were purely speculative operations with high leverage, which greatly inflates the figures.
In the Madrid newspaper La Gaceta on March 4, 2014, Karen Huds stated that she had been fired from this bank (or from the World Bank, according to Wikipedia) for reporting corrupt practices there. As a highly competent person with a law degree from Yale University, she had spent more than twenty years of her professional career there. As a senior legal advisor, she was able to observe how certain elites dominate the world through a hermetically sealed core of financial institutions and corporations, with the consent of the world’s leading governments.
All of this was rejected by the IMF and other similar bodies, and some court rulings have also been issued in this regard. However, 13 years ago, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich conducted an initial analysis of the relationships between 37 million companies and investors worldwide, discovering the existence of a ‘super-entity’ of 147 mega-corporations that act in close concert, controlling 40% of the global economy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSSKpL87_Rs.
The apex of control
This invisible and secretive apex, which supposedly seeks to dominate the world, exerts significant influence over the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and central banks, controlling all money issuance and its international circulation. To delve deeper into this issue, simply enter “credits as manipulation of banks and governments” into Google’s search engine.
Everything said in this essay now forms the grid of a global puzzle of conspiracy unified from a single elitist apex, much more important than the US, China, or Russia, considered in isolation. The goal of this domination is the subjugation of the individual through dependence on debt and the media. Movies, TV, and the internet continuously produce a certain brainwashing, seeking to unify their thoughts and preferences. Total globalization in all areas seems to be a goal sought by some in order to better exercise their dominance over the world.
How can we not remember Orwell’s “Big Brother,” who, thanks to digital technology, manages to control the world? Another indication that seems to prove Ms. Huds right are the big lies that were spread in the media until a year ago and which no one accepts anymore: global warming, the changing concept of the family, the license to kill unborn children, the attempt to animalize man, the exaltation of animals almost above man, the heterosexual family, and the exaltation of pleasure and feeling above reason. On these points, every citizen must decide according to his or her own conscience, because in any case they have profound moral relevance.
Debt, an instrument for producing fear.
These decisions of conscience have a profound impact on the life of a country, even more so than political voting, because their consequences drastically change society itself, such as whether or not to have children. On this point alone, millions of individual decisions can cause an entire nation to disappear ethnically, creating a demographic imbalance that is already a cause for concern for everyone today. Isn’t this tendency toward the equalization of thoughts and values screaming that we are all victims of a murky plot? Isn’t it time to sit down and think, to be more critical of the priorities and values that the environment in which we live instills in us?
Would it not be conceivable to apply this model to what is happening with the indebtedness of states, banks, and even individuals? Because global indebtedness cannot simply be the result of a series of coincidences, but rather seems to be something planned in advance to achieve a goal of domination based on corruption at all levels, which further reinforces dependence through the fear of reporting the crime itself. The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) indicates that global debt is near historic highs, reaching 2.6 times global GDP.