English 
Español 
Peter Kopa, Prague, 9.2.2024 – The English version follows below
Introduction
To delve deeper into the ideological presuppositions from which the UN originates, I quote below from the journal ‘Postmodernia’ of 9.7.2021, in italics:
‘Globalism has its genesis in the worldview of Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture in conjunction with the evolution of Enlightenment thought, with particular impetus from the Masonic secret society. In Kant’s ˇPerpetual Peace’, globalism finds a philosophical referent to support the universal cosmopolitan society it advocates, but stripping the State of its natural foundation.
Freemasonry has always displayed a belligerent secularism against Catholicism and a universalist vocation. The secularization of all public and private life has always been an open and declared objective of Freemasonry since the French Revolution, which seeks to replace the concept of God with that of the “Great Architect of the Universe” and transcendent morality with a utilitarian relativism. Parallel to this, in matters of political organization, they have also pursued the establishment of the universal republic and the much-vaunted universal peace and welfare, as they affirmed in the International Masonic Congress of Paris in 1889 or in the Masonic Congress of Allied and Neutral Nations also held in Paris in 1917, which supported the creation of a supranational institution to guarantee these objectives: the League of Nations. In 1962 the “Call of Strasbourg”, elaborated by the main Masonic organizations, insists on fraternity and a common universal policy for the sustainable growth of the world. https://thinktanklatam.org/2022/03/26/la-conspiracion-de-la-logia-p2-en-italia/
Statements by Prof. Pedro Jordao, Porto in the Neue Zuercher Zeitung in Switzerland, summarized in the following two subheadings:
Reaction to Hamas attack.
The United Nations, as a continuation of the League of Nations, was founded by 51 countries in 1945, after the Second World War, which cost the lives of 60 million people. Today it has 193 members and in 1945 there were only 99 independent nations, and today there are more than 200 countries. In its Founding Charter it states, among other things, that its purpose is to ensure international security. And in many resolutions, the UN declares that terrorism is a threat whose perpetrators must be arrested and punished.
Thus, after the attacks on the twin towers in New York on September 11, 2001, the then UN Secretary General Kofi Annan condemned it in the strongest possible terms. In contrast, in the case of the Hamas massacre of October 7 last year, the UN has relativized it.
How is it that the UN tried to play down this catastrophe carried out by Hamas in Israel, which went beyond any notion of humanity? Why did the UN not pronounce its condemnation and call for the punishment of the guilty? The UN has not only disregarded its own resolutions, it has also reneged on its own moral code.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres made the following statement: “I have unequivocally condemned the terrible and unprecedented acts of terror perpetrated by Hamas in Israel on October 7. But it is important to recognize that the Hamas attacks were not carried out without cause. The Palestinian people have been subjected to an oppressive occupation for 56 years.”
Change of purpose at the UN
Then UN Secretary General Kofi Annan had much to say after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001: “Terrorism must never be accepted or justified, whatever the motive.” The UN has always defended the ethical principle that there is no “understandable” terrorism. Terrorism exists and is defined by its methods and not by its causes. After October 7, the UN has set aside its own human rights code, much to the delight of extremists.
When crimes against humanity are minimized, relativized and even ignored, terrorist groups in Asia, Africa and Europe feel encouraged and vindicated in their atrocities. For jihadist Islamism, non-Muslims and moderate Muslims are equally targeted. Both must join forces to counter the genocidal policy orchestrated by Iran to wipe out Israel and Islamically colonize the world.
Had the UN clearly condemned Hamas immediately, Israel’s military intervention in Gaza might have been less destructive. The UN has deliberately and systematically failed to take appropriate action in this regard. Its increasingly dysfunctional behavior is contributing to making our world less safe. The UN is a great idea in itself, but when autocracies and dictatorships are increasingly cynical, often even violently pursuing their own interests, the UN is on its way to becoming a sorry shadow of what it should be.
Additional comments
Our view is that, to date, both sides in the war in Jerusalem are at fault, considering the unnecessary harshness of the Israeli forces against the Palestinian people, who do not identify with the Islamic belligerence of Hamas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_United_Nations This link is one more document among many, which denounces the UN for being practically an agency of the globalists the Davos 2030 Agenda, as is the European Union. And those who pull the strings from anonymity are secret societies, which use their economic power to keep their agents in key positions, mainly in the world’s leading governments. This manipulative infiltration goes as far as the direct partial financing of the bureaucratic apparatus of international organizations, such as the WHO. In this way, the rights of the member countries, which nevertheless continue to cover the bulk of their billion-dollar budgets, are set aside.
The strategy employed by the UN, the EU or many other dependent or non-dependent organizations is as follows:
First step: organization of an international meeting to study a specific problem proposed by the international organization, or rather by the hidden power that controls it. Therefore, these are issues that interest them for their ultimate goal, which is the establishment of the new world order. In this sense, priority is given to the environmental emergency, where they sell the false proposals of CO2, warming, sea rise, health issues such as pandemics, etc. And who pays for all this? The member countries with their annual quotas, covering also the travel and stay expenses of their representatives in some important capital. In other words, the hidden power deals the decks of cards and then carries out the thematic deliberations as it sees fit, using a flowery and seductive language: reproductive health, as an alibi for abortion, or the defense of women against abuse by their husbands, as a pretext to achieve the redefinition of the family. The outcome of the meeting is the proclamation of guidelines and recommendations to the member countries, which are not yet binding on them. https://thinktanklatam.org/2024/01/11/el-control-secreto-del-mundo/
Second step: ‘experts’ are sent to the governments of the member countries, with the task of getting laws passed, which force citizens to obey what is agreed upon in the guidelines: for example, laws imposing sex education for children, redefining the family, introducing gender ideology, or banning explosive engines from 2030 in Europe, or demanding to reduce cattle to less than half in countries like Uruguay or Holland etc. etc. etc. etc. With this form of action, abortion has been introduced years ago even in Mexico and Poland, at a legislative speed never seen before. Unfortunately, some countries give in to globalist pressure in exchange, for example, for large soft loans to official bodies, from which even corruption is then facilitated. Lately, even extortion has been verified https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/blackmail-systém and assesination https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/live-qa-02-01-at-1030am-et-un-accused-of-aiding-terror-networks-through-unrwa-live-with-josh-5577971.
Moreover, this whole process is supported by a concerted artillery of the globalist-controlled media. Many governments have opposed this game, as is the case of Paraguay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw08fCGT0JI.
