https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QISQPLaVYg
Peter Kopa, Prague, 16.1.2023
Preliminary considerations
In knowing things, man creates, thanks to reason, an abstract concept for each of them, under which he ‘files’ in his memory, those things. At the same time, he confers on them a verbal sign or name, without which he would not be able to refer to them in communication with others. Thus, for example, the concept of liquid, which covers any liquid substance. The concepts are the same in all languages, but not their names. If this were not so, it would not be possible to learn another language.
The first degree of abstraction is concerned with things of the extramental physical world and with entities of reason. In the second degree, one considers only their quantity, which is the domain of Mathematics, and in the third degree of abstraction one is concerned only with the aspect of their mere existence, that they are. At this level moves the philosophy, which is divided according to the various questions such as the being itself, its cause and its cognizability by man.
In everyday life, man moves mostly in the first degree of abstraction, based on the irrefutable evidence of the patency of physical objects or reason that present themselves to his spirit.
Understanding the manipulation of language
But what if some high authority tells us, for example, that there is no radical difference between the human sexes, or that there is no such thing as trees, or cows and so on. This claim would crash against the absolutely evident patency of the things we see and use, and, therefore, could not deceive us. If one wanted to ignore, redefine or ignore concepts here, all the particular sciences and technology would not be possible. If physical laws were not followed, for example, we would still be in the caves.
But the case of words that refer to immaterial objects of reason, such as freedom, justice, human rights, democracy, etc., is quite different. These are deformable concepts, because they are related to various immaterial realities, such as human dignity, culture, etc. Therefore, if a perverse instance had the means to create a worldwide campaign to redefine the concept ‘family’, it could convince part of the population that it is not a natural institution, but the product of political, economic and cultural conditioning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yleY1e44RFA
And if the perverse manipulator succeeds in converting this conceptual deformation into a law, it could go to the extreme of the state being the one to introduce free love, the equiparation of homosexual unions to heterosexual ones, when and how many children can be has and even to annul the parental authority of the parents in relation to their children, if it is in the interest of the manipulator’s goal.
The state or an unholy alliance of most of the information media – called the ‘mainstream media’ – could then ideologically deform any immaterial concept, in order to make the human mass think and act according to falsified conceptual contents. This would be the most perfect tyranny, because the human mass would behave docilely as the tyrant wants. We would thus be a flock of human sheep, in which each one thinks he is acting freely. Crítica a los mainstream media
In this sense, the dominant globalist groups of the macroeconomy, which have just met in Davos, are allied with the state, for example, in the USA, Canada, Holland and others, giving birth to a criminal collusion that is crying out to heaven and provoking growing counter-reactions. The boycott inflicted on the Walt Disney Group for spreading sex education for children is a case in point. Its shares have fallen more than 40% in the NY stock market. Los engaños de los ´mainstream media´
We are thus faced with the genesis of lies about concepts on the truth of which the common good of society and a dignified and happy human life depend. This reflection can also be applied to many other concepts. Some examples:
– The natural difference between men and women is being denied, which is causing sex change surgeries that globalists call it ˇaffirmation therapy’.
– The ‘hate speech’ or hate words, which have been arbitrarily defined as a criminal offense, which is a weapon to attack and subdue the citizen who holds a truth, when it does not fit the globalist dogmas. So is the criterion of ‘political correctness’ and the claim that the state is the absolute guardian of the truth.
– The attempt to convince that in reality there is neither homeland, nor national borders, nor God, nor religion. It is a cancellation of truths, which is typical of the globalist subideology of the ‘cancel culture’.
– Induced abortion, which in reality is a concept that means killing the unborn, becomes a manifestation of ‘reproductive freedom’ or a way of taking care of one’s own ‘reproductive health’.
Klaus Schwab’s globalism uses these traps, in addition to other subterfuges, to achieve a tyrannical government, seeking drastic world depopulation. His program is the new world order, the motto of the secret societies that pull the strings worldwide, from the dark clutches of anonymity so as not to be held accountable. Thank God this attempt is facing the opposition of a Judeo-Christian culture of four millennia, which has given the West its greatness. This contest will be tough, but in the end the truth will triumph.
Precedents of language manipulation
It is evident that concepts have a great influence on the way man apprehends reality. That is to say, it imprints and shapes his thinking itself. About this I can tell an anecdote that I lived in South America, some 65 years ago. I was once with a group of children between ten and twelve years old. They were very poor, who could not read and had never seen a movie in their lives. I told them that, in Europe, sometimes, instead of raining, water freezes, forming white snowflakes. My interlocutors looked at each other and burst out laughing, making fun of me in the sense that how could I come up with such nonsense. This phenomenon is repeated millions of times every day, when man, for lack of true concepts, unintentionally makes wrong judgments that can cause him immense harm, condemning him to live a wretched life.
The foremost German authority on philology and language history, Prof. Horst Dieter Schlosser, discusses in his book ‘Language under the Swastika’ how all dictatorships use every piece of public information to consolidate their power. They fear and fight freedom of speech by means of denigrating concepts, seeking to ridicule or degrade their opponents. Nazism has given an ideologically deformed content to concepts such as the German people, the living space, the Jews, the Aryan race and so many other words. The ideologues of communist propaganda have done the same since 1917 in Rusia.