English 
Español 
Peter Kopa, Prague, 11.12.2023
Recently, on 8.12.23, the ‘New York Times’ had referred to the open war that has been unleashed between Elon Musk and the highest exponents of the Davos 2030 Agenda, who want to raze our culture and institutions to impose their new world order. For this they need the services of X (formerly Twitter) controlled by Elon Musk. The New York media reports that the mainstream media is on uproar over Elon Musk’s recent interview, on the occasion of the annual New York DealBook summit last week, which nearly blew up the Internet.
While the interview was an hour and a half long, it was only five minutes of Elon M.’s conversation with New York Times reporter Andrew Ross Sorkin that really raised hackles. Elon Musk lambasted the media companies because they were organizing a boycott against his X (formerly Twitter), using his tough American language: “fuck ’em.” And it’s no wonder they’re climbing the walls: the economic sector that is pushing hardest to impose the boycott against X are mainstream media, the giant media conglomerates Comcast, Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery, along with cable networks NBC and CBS, are leading the charge against Musk’s free-speech platform, which he plants by saying, “If someone is going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, f*** them” (sorry to translate: f*** them). This Musk told a stunned audience at Manhattan’s Lincoln Centre. “Is that clear? I hope so,” he said, adding, “Hey, Bob, if you’re in the audience, take note!” as a taunting gesture directed at Disney CEO Bob Iger.
Comments
The globalist movement has originated in the USA, from where it seeks to impose its ideological and totalitarian criteria on other countries. However, its origins their roots appear in a certain way in the 18th century with the appearance of secret societies. These were at first unions of convenience between engineers and builders of the time, who discovered the power of their know-how, for example, in the construction of cathedrals and sophisticated buildings. Thus it is understandable that the development of technology has given them power and influence. Some seventy years ago, one of the first interventions, in this sense, has been sterilization campaigns in poor countries, as a necessary condition for development aid. Then they have promoted birth control pills, followed by the legalization of abortion and the instrumentalization of the pharmaceutical industry to bring the world under their thumb. The attempted COVID 19 pandemic ¿La pandemia preparada desde 1990?) was not only a failure, but they have caused an enormous erosion of the trust that citizens had in their governments. https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-billionaire-classs-secret-deals-and-the-globalist-plot-to-dominate
These societies have thematized the environment, through the Club of Rome, in the seventies of the last century: I was then living in Zurich and I remember perfectly well the deployment of energy terrorism, based on the gratuitous assertion of the imminent exhaustion of natural resources, especially oil. After half a century, the known reserves of this hydrocarbon are sufficient to supply us for at least the next hundred years. And coal reserves are practically inexhaustible. And to all this we can add new technologies such as photovoltaic and wind energy resources and nuclear energy.
The ideologies of LTGB, WOKE, genderism etc. are facing a firm rejection in the USA. And through ESG (Environmental and Social Governance) the globalists had even tried to force financial institutions to require their clients to take very costly measures to clean up the environment. The failure of this absurd initiative is due to the fact that the US market is averse to any economic dirigisme. Blackrock itself, a conglomerate with some 12 trillion dollars of clients, had to reject the ESG after having been one of its promoters, in order to avoid losing clients. In reality, they are cardboard giants, because financial institutions work with the money of their customers, who go elsewhere if they see something they don’t like. The same is happening with the Walt Disney companies, which are finding out for the first time how the boycott can hit heavyly.
The countries most influenced by the globalists, after the USA, are Canada, Holland and Australia. As is well known, this influence is contributing to a political move to the righ. This phenomenon, logically, has its own characteristics in each country. The most recent, in this sense, has been manifested in the recent elections in Holland. Germany and many other countries show tectonic movements in the political choices of their citizens, who during the last year have become convinced of the bad game of the globalists, who continue with their old method of buying official, thus producing a criminal collusion between big capital and the state (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QAcvmT63Hg.) Here it is worth praising a whole series of Latin American countries that have resolutely opposed selling out for money (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcBynl35Cts&t=376s).
